I'm reading Lolita for the first time. It's amazing, and I'm moving very slowly. I pore over the words that catch my breath in my throat. Sometimes I just sit and stare at a sentence for a full minute. I keep finding tiny strings of perfection.
« 1592 | Main | Live Ad Libbing! »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a010536fbb466970c0105370edbf8970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Did I Wait, and Where Can I Get More?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
oh, it's so good. good luck with pale fire. it's a little tougher. did you ever read "the wind up bird chronicles" by Haruki Murakami? PLEASE read it if you have time. my favorite book.
Posted by: yiekes | February 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
He is so goddamned good.
I'm with Jeffrey. I wish I was you so I could be reading that stuff for the first time again.
Read Pale Fire next, and then you can move to others. (I'm reading Orhan Pamuk right now, and I can see an influence there, but I suspect you won't be hurting for recommendations.)
Posted by: Chico | February 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
One of my favorite books due to his soaring prose. Was it because he was tackling his first novel in English? The words are just astonishing, the concepts challenging, and the satire stings your eyes. An amazing work, no doubt!!
Posted by: Joe P. | February 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Back in college my friend Pat saw me reading it and asked "Are you reading that for the first time?" and I said yeah. He said "I'm so jealous of you."
Posted by: Jeffrey | February 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
I am so happy for you.
Posted by: Vera | February 06, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Great book, yep, but I felt it was about 50 pages too long. Other than that, Nabokov is a genius.
Posted by: erat | February 07, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Well, isn't that nice. You discovered the book version of the camwhore. I don't know how things are going out there in San Liberalisco but I for one thank God that someone like you won't be dropping the Femnicunts of tomorrow on this coast any more. You plan to read that to your daughter as a bedtime story so she knows what to expect out of life under Clinton II: AKA Socialized Handjobs For Schoolteachers? If there was any justice you would have gotten there a little early and been nothing but a tits in a tiger's belly. Why not try something like The Bible or Ayn Rand instead of that annotated mulchpile some communist wrote.
Posted by: The 7th Meat | February 07, 2008 at 12:00 AM
The second time around, I recommend the annotated version. Lolita has so many layers, it's almost impossible to discover them alone. People have spent years uncovering the mysteries of that great novel, and it is a great benefit that someone else has done the leg work.
Posted by: Ian | February 08, 2008 at 12:00 AM
I am reading the annotated version, but I'm plowing through without the notes first time around, then I'll re-read it with the flipping back and forth.
Posted by: brittney | February 08, 2008 at 12:00 AM